Is Philip Schofield and Fern Brittain the best they can do?

I'm unlucky enough to be at home and I'm watching them two on telly. Theres 60 million people in the UK..surely the broadcasters can do better than that!

Is Philip Schofield and Fern Brittain the best they can do?
HEY YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YES YOU!!

Leave Phil and Fern alone.

They are bloody good fun to watch and they have humility and regard for ordinary people.......something these so-called celebs severly lack.

Go pick on someone else.

YOU WANT BACK-CHAT???

I'LL GIVE YOU BACK-CHAT MY BOY..........CITY-GENT??

I THINK NOT!
Reply:Phillip and Fern are the best. They come across as so friendly and have a great sense of humour.



Who wouldn't fancy the silver fox? http://www.schofieldfans.co.uk Report It
Reply:Girls used to fancy him back in the day, and he used to be funny with the Broom cupboard thing. I hate Fern.
Reply:I agree with you that there are people far more brighter and beautiful than Fern in the UK. However, sometimes I think it is a deliberate arrangement by the producers of these daytime television shows that aim at women (in particular, housewives). It's not just Philip Schofield and Fern Brittain. Look at Richard and Judy. In both cases, the male presenter always looks better and younger than the female one, who is always a bit frumpy, overweight and not particularly smart (they might be highly intelligent ladies but it is not the impression they give people). The viewers at home might feel subconsciously "Oh, poor Philip/Richard, he has to spend so much time with this boring, plain woman. I could do better than she" and this feeling perhaps does some good to the ego of the viewers and keeps them watching these programmes. They get a lot of pleasure out of criticizing the way the female presenter looks and talks. If the lady presenter is clever, well-spoken, knowledgeable, chic, sexy and slim, the viewers might feel inferior, jealous and alienated. All the females presenters of these British housewives programmes seem to share similar traits of being not very smart, not dressing trendily and being a bit on the fat side. It's all for the sake of the delicate ego of female viewers. It is female competitiveness, I'm afraid.
Reply:prefer phil and fern to phil and lorraine kelly. shes so annoying with her "super, fab, and sooooo gorgeous" phrases!
Reply:Do what I do, turn over to MTV I hate daytime TV, I think the producers think that people at home are brain dead hence phil and fern, or better still go on and answer some questions (but be careful it can become addictive) gotta go and read some more questions, bye
Reply:Those two crack me up. They are low budget richard and judy
Reply:No one is forcing you to watch them. I think they are great presenters and wish they were on at a later time. Watch something else or turn tv off and read a book.
Reply:That VOICE - it actually sounds like someone is standing on his windpipe. AND STILL HE LIVES!!! AIEEE!!!
Reply:lol there better than lorne spicer on bbc1 who is on nearly every morning programme. but i do get your point there is as much 5hit on in the morning as a weekend.
Reply:What are you doing watching those two when the sci-fi channel is showing wall to wall Star Trek???
Reply:and you'd prefer who??



Pete and Kate??? (andre and jordan)

Wayne and Coleen???



no perfect



David and Victoria.



Guess Phil n Minty are the best out there sparing the legends that are Rich and Judes
Reply:bevies and butt head would be better
Reply:ITV really has had a terrible DECADE when it comes to decent television shows....even Channel 5 does better and that had a really slow start.



Boycot ITV, that's what I do
Reply:Fern and Phil are BRILLIANT!! They are so cheesy and blatantly think the world of each other, it really makes me chuckle when I watch them. Especially when they get the fits of the giggles. I agree with someone further up on the page - better than Lorraine Kelly